Introduction
Staff appraisal is a process of review by teachers, school
heads, deputy school heads and other senior teachers of individual
competencies, performance, and professional needs. In a small
school, it is likely to be you, as school head, who carries
out the appraisal of staff, but in a large school this may be
delegated to the deputy head or head of department. It is a
process in which an individual teacher and a senior colleague
collaborate in evaluating that teacher's work as a professional
person. This means appraising all aspects of a teacher's organisation
of their classroom, how they manage classroom activities, including
the use of time and materials, how they behave towards pupils,
other teachers, the school head, parents and the community.
In this unit, you will learn why staff appraisal should be
carried out and how to do so. The unit can be used for self
study or with peer group learning with other head teachers.
Individual study time: 3 hours
Learning outcomes
At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
understand what staff appraisal is, and why it should
be carried out
know the steps which form the procedures for staff
appraisal
analyse your own leadership style and know which approaches
are most effective for positive staff appraisal
know how to carry out staff appraisal
decide how to follow up a staff appraisal
understand the need for self-appraisal.
Reasons for appraisal
Appraisal is directed towards helping a teacher to become
as effective as possible in the teaching/learning process,
and also towards meeting a teacher's needs for professional
development, for example, in-service training and career prospects.
You should not, therefore, view appraisal as a mechanism for
fault-finding and criticising, but as a means of building
the teacher's positive self-image and motivation to be as
good a teacher as possible. In Namibia, as in much of Africa,
education is becoming more learner-centred than previously,
on the basis that pupils need to become actively involved
in their own learning processes, in order to learn and develop
to the full. Pupils, and teachers too, need to participate
in their own development, becoming able to analyse and reflect
on their own competencies. From this, they are more likely
to become independent thinkers and doers. For the majority
of teachers, this requires a change of attitude, and this
can only come from a willingness to review continually what
takes place in the classroom and the school, and the effects
particular actions have on others.
Requirements for appraisal
A good appraisal process, in which the teacher is able
to be honest about strengths and weaknesses, and about where
help and encouragement are needed, depends on a spirit of
trust between the school head, or other senior teacher, and
the teacher being appraised. It follows that you, or the senior
teacher carrying out the appraisal, must be a professional
person who is respected for your competence, and who has a
good relationship with the staff.
This means that if you have to give criticism for lateness
or lack of preparation in the classroom, you give it with
the understanding that the particular teacher needs guidance.
Thus, your comments will not be made in an unkind manner,
but with the intention of being constructive. This should
be the case even where a teacher refuses or is unable to change
unacceptable behaviour, and you need to initiate disciplinary
action in the interests of the learners. If you are seen to
be a person who really knows the teacher, the pupils and the
classroom reality, and you are known to be a person who has
respect for the feelings of teachers and pupils, appraisal
is more likely to take place in a spirit of mutual confidence.
Differences from other forms of assessment
Appraisal is not undertaken as a means of assessment of
a teacher for purposes of rating or grading. It is a very
different process from being inspected or supervised by a
person in higher authority, in which the teacher has no share.
Indeed, if appraisal is carried out in a negative spirit of
sitting in judgement, it fails in its purpose. Instead, the
teacher should be treated as a stakeholder in the educational
process, working in a collaborative way to become as good
as possible, and as a person who has professional needs and
interests. Your role as school head in this, is that of educational
leader in the school, with the task of creating an effective
learning environment for all pupils, of all abilities, and
with varying needs that should be met. The teacher being appraised
shares this task.
The process of staff appraisal
There are a number of steps to be taken in carrying out
staff appraisal. Before these can begin, you need to have
discussions with the staff as a whole. Teachers need to be
confident that they can be open with you so that if they feel
the management style is faulty, they can say this in the knowledge
that you and other members of the management team will review
your own style.
A second important element is to emphasise that what is said
during the process of appraisal will be treated as confidential.
A teacher who reveals personal insecurity or details of an
unhappy domestic life during discussion, needs to feel sure
that this will not become common knowledge in the staff room
or community. Professional ambitions, too, have a right to
be kept private. Appraisal should not be used as a means of
making comparisons between one teacher and another.
Establishing a good atmosphere
In the first stage of discussion with staff concerning
appraisal, you will need to make clear the purpose, and how
it is to be done. The actual procedures should be discussed,
and staff ideas taken into account. A timetable needs to be
drawn up, so that each teacher has time to prepare his or
her own thoughts, knowing when you will carry out observations
within specific classrooms, and when interviews will be held.
Follow-up procedures should be discussed, in which actions
will be initiated, for example, planning for in-service training.
You, or the senior staff member to whom you have delegated
the task or designated senior staff, should prepare for the
whole process by analysing your attitudes to leadership, as
in the following activity.
Activity 4.1
What are your attitudes to leadership? Tick either (a)
or (b) in each statement.
(1) Leadership should be
(a) supervisory (b) a matter of professional development.
(2) When observing teachers' lessons I look for
(a) incompetence (b) competence.
(3) Management in a school should be
(a) hierarchical (b) professional partnership.
(4) My attitude to leadership is
(a) looking at the past (b) looking to the future.
(5) Attitudes to staff should be based on
(a) suspicion (b) trust.
Comments
Your attitudes as to whether, for example, you look for
incompetence in the teachers, or try to identify competence,
are important in determining whether staff appraisal is likely
to be a positive process of staff development. If you ticked
mostly (a) in Activity 4.1 you may need to re-think your style
of leadership. See Unit
2, Module 1 Self-Development for Educational Managers,
for more information about leadership styles.
The teacher's own assessment
The process begins with the teacher's own personal review
of successes, failures, professional and personal needs. One
method that is often used is to keep a diary to record thoughts
about the daily activities of the classroom. A teacher's everyday
life is normally so busy that, unless time is set aside for
this, the important activity of reflection gets set aside.
A teacher might write as follows:
'Today, I began to feel that teaching the whole class together
in Mathematics left some children bored. The clever ones finish
their work very quickly, and get it right, and then misbehave,
while some of the others were so slow and did not seem to
understand. I would like to organise them in groups but am
not sure how to do it. How will I make sure that all the class
is getting on with their work if I do not have them all facing
the blackboard?'
Classroom/task observations
As a good school head, you probably visit classrooms on
a regular basis. You have found that this helps you to be
knowledgeable about what is happening in the school. Classroom/task
observations in staff appraisal may well be already part of
the school's routine. For the purpose of staff appraisal,
you need to arrange a time to observe a specific lesson. You
should be present in the classroom for the whole period to
observe the entire sequence of the lesson. Only then can you
form your ideas about the preparation, organisation and management
of teaching and learning in the classroom.
The questions which follow may be helpful in providing a
structure for class observations.
1 Is the classroom clean and would a pupil find it a pleasant
place to be in?
2 Does the teacher begin the lesson on time?
3 Has the lesson been well prepared and does it match with
the syllabus or scheme of work?
4 Are all materials shown in the lesson plan available to
the pupils?
5 Is the relationship between teacher and pupils good or bad?
6 Do pupils listen when the teacher speaks, and do they appear
to respect the teacher without seeming afraid?
7 Does the organisation and management (whole class work,
group work, individual activity, practical activity, etc.)
meet the needs of the pupils and the subject area?
Your responses to these questions will provide you with important
information concerning the teacher's ability to provide learners
with good quality teaching. If you observe poor preparation
or interaction with pupils, these may indicate that the teacher
has other problems. These may concern discipline or complaints
from parents or community, for example, about lateness or
possible alcohol abuse. Such information provides other data
that needs to be discussed in the appraisal interview.
Appraisal interview and target setting
This should take place as soon as possible after the classroom
observations, so you and the teacher need to make an appointment
to meet. The form and length of the interview can vary, but
there should be discussion of the classroom observations.
Since the purpose is to assist the teacher's professional
development and the learning experiences for the children,
the approach should be positive. Praise should be given for
as much as possible, for example, 'I noticed how busy you
were trying to keep the clever ones occupied whilst the slow
ones were finishing their work'. The aim is to build the teacher's
confidence and self esteem because, through this, the teacher
is more likely to discuss uncertainties about his or her work.
In the example of the diary quoted earlier, you and the teacher
may then go on to discuss ways of grouping pupils to provide
for different ability levels.
From the discussion in the interview, targets can be set.
You can arrange for help to be offered within the school,
or for other in-service training. You can encourage the teacher
to try out other methods of working, with the assurance that
there will be full support during a time of change. Managing
change can be stressful for a teacher, because of a fear of
failure and many people prefer not to take risks.
Some avoidance behaviour, for example, lateness, absenteeism
or alcohol abuse, can stem from feelings of inadequacy. The
teacher whose lesson is badly prepared, can be asked if he
or she thinks that the lesson would have been better if he
or she had not been late or drunk. This opens up the subject,
but in a positive spirit, which is more likely to lead to
full and frank discussion of the teacher's professional responsibilities.
Here, targets can be set which must be realistic, and any
improvement should be commented on, for example, 'You were
only late one day this week. Keep trying, the teaching was
much better'. In this way, the teacher's morale can be raised
and, for some, can be sufficient to bring about real improvement.
Follow-up discussion/meetings
An important point about the appraisal process is that
it should be an on-going process. In-service training arrangements
may be initiated, discussion of improvements in teaching and
learning in the classroom may take place, or a teacher may
need to be encouraged to seek promotion. All such activities
are part of your professional responsibilities as educational
leader in the school. In the large school, part of this task
will be shared by senior staff.
Activity 4.2
The case study below will help you practise your appraisal
knowledge and skills before you begin work with your school
staff.
Case study
1 Use the diary made by the teacher shown above.
2 In your observation of a lesson in this teacher's classroom,
you have noted as follows:
'Mrs Mukendwa started this lesson punctually. Her explanations
to her Grade 4 class were clear, and she revised the procedures
for carrying out division by 10. She chose two pupils to work
out examples on the board and then gave all the class four
examples to work out on their own in their books. During this
time, Mrs Mukendwa walked round the classroom, looking at
pupils' work. After ten minutes, six children had finished
their work while all the rest were still working. The six
early finishers began to misbehave, tickling other children
and banging pencils on the table. Mrs Mukendwa spoke sternly
to the six, and told them to sit still and be quiet. At the
end of the lesson, most of the class had not finished.'
3 Which, from A and B below, is a positive appraisal technique?
A) Ask Mrs Mukendwa how she felt about her lesson and listen
to her description of her worries. Discuss these with her,
and suggest ways of grouping the class according to mathematical
ability, with different work or amount for each group. Ask
her if she would like help in doing this.
B) Tell Mrs Mukendwa that she should become angry with the
slow workers and tell them to hurry up. Tell Mrs. Mukendwa
that you are not satisfied with her work and that she must
make sure that children do not misbehave. Inform her that
you expect better performance from her in the next appraisal.
4 If you were Mrs Mukendwa, which of A or B would you find
more helpful? Give your reasons.
Professional development activities
Some professional development activities can be carried out
within the school, for example, the head of department provides
assistance in improving the teacher's skills in classroom
management. Others may need asking the school inspector or
subject adviser to arrange in-service training on a course.
The teacher, following appraisal, may show leadership potential,
and the school inspector or other senior management should
be informed of this.
Frequency of appraisal
The decision as to how often the appraisal of each individual
teacher should take place should be made by consensus within
the school as a whole. This decision depends on the size of
the school, and how many senior staff are available but, overall,
once a year is a reasonable interval.
Benefits of appraisal
The benefits of staff appraisal have been referred to
throughout this unit. Module
6, Monitoring School Effectiveness, demonstrates the use
of guidance and counselling from a school head following classroom
observations. School effectiveness includes a combination
of the way in which the work of individual teachers, and senior
management within the school collaborate for the benefit of
the learners. Under the headings of 'Staff needs' and 'The
needs of the pupils' (Unit
3), Module 1, Self Development for Educational Managers,
outlines the mission of the school, which is also the mission
of the head and all teachers. Module
1 also notes the importance of the school head giving
positive professional guidance if staff are to perform their
function effectively.
The benefits can be summarised as:
skills development, through in-service training, experiments
with teaching style, often assisted by organisational change
career development, through in-service training
improved relationships: each understands the other
better
increased knowledge of the school and individuals
productive links between appraisal and school development
and planning
improved learning opportunities for pupils
improved morale and efficiency within the school.
Summary
When carried out in a spirit of willing co-operation,
with positive attitudes on both sides, you should find that
staff appraisal contributes to school effectiveness. To be
successful and have the desired benefits, you must examine
closely your own style of leadership. Does this provide for
a shared sense of responsibility amongst all school staff?
All staff members are stakeholders in the educational life
of the school, and are more likely to be motivated to improve
their performance, if they feel a sense of ownership. You,
in turn, will feel supported in your often difficult and lonely
task. |